A visitor walks in from the street and through every hall, in the order you would take them
We photograph the building the way a visitor walks it: the street, the door, the ticket desk, then each hall in the order you would take them. A visitor clicks an arrow and moves to that spot. The tour we hand over is a website on its own. The photographs, the interface, your fonts and the code are in 1 folder. Put it at your own address and it runs. Every claim here has its limit beside it.
The 2 claims this page will not make
- “A tour brings more visitors.” We looked on 4 August 2026. 6 searches of the research indexes found no study measuring a museum visit against a tour. Nothing shows a tour brings anybody in. And nothing shows it keeps anybody away. Both halves are unproven. We will not guess either way.
- “A tour raises ticket money, donations or your chances of a grant.” All 3 were tested. All 3 failed. No funder in any country asks for a walkthrough by name. The national statistics office publishes no revenue line for this sector. Nobody selling into this market publishes an outcome figure either.
-
A visitor starts at the street, goes in the door, past the ticket desk, then hall by hall the way you walk it.
What we sell is the walk through this building. Everything we publish is a paragraph and a photograph of the front door.
Directors of single-site museums and historic houses; whoever keeps the website
What you sell is the walk through the building. What you publish is a paragraph and a photograph of the front door. From that a visitor cannot tell what the halls hold or how they follow each other. With a tour they start at the street, go in the door, past the ticket desk, then hall by hall the way you walk it yourself. Nobody has measured what the front-door paragraph costs you, and we will not invent a number.
We photograph the building the way a visitor walks it. The arrival, the entrance and the ticket desk come first, then each hall in the order your route takes them. We draw arrows on the floor and in the doorways, so a visitor clicks where they want to go and goes there. The stairs and the landings are photographed too, not left out. The walking is in the price. It is the tour, not an extra.
- We tried 51 Albanian web addresses on 4 August 2026. 17 answered. 10 of those are cultural or heritage bodies. Exactly 1 of the 10 publishes a walk anybody can take. Home pages only, and we ran no scripts.
- The arrows that join the halls come with every tour and are never an extra. Our published rate card says so, so the walking carries no surcharge.
You can only walk where the camera stood. The route is fixed on the day, and a new way through means coming back. Our local check is 10 home pages that answered on 1 day, not a census. 34 of 51 addresses did not answer. We ran no scripts. 1 site we could not read at all. We may never say no Albanian museum has a tour: 27 were published. Not publishing a walk is evidence about publishing, not about demand. And nothing we have shot is a museum.
-
A visitor zooms in on writing behind glass across the hall, and a click can play a recorded voice about it.
A tour of a museum with no labels is just halls. And the thing they came for is behind glass on the far side of the hall.
Curators and interpretation staff; any institution whose value sits in a few objects
People come for 1 object and then see it from across the hall, behind glass. A wide photograph of the gallery leaves the label unreadable, so the tour ends up being halls with no labels. Here a visitor zooms in until they can read the writing, and a click can play a recorded voice telling them what they are looking at.
1 visit gives you 3 things. Every photograph is kept in tiles at several sizes, so a visitor zooms into an inscription, a brushstroke or a maker's mark and it stays sharp. The browser loads only the part being looked at, and that is in every price. A marker on the object opens a full-size close-up over the hall. A marker can also play a recorded voice, so a curator explains what somebody is looking at. Writing the words is quoted separately.
- Zooming comes with every photograph and is never an extra. Tiled photographs are on our published list of what we make, so the close look at the object is in the price of the hall.
- A marker opens where the visitor is standing. They get the close-up over the hall without leaving it or losing their place.
- The close-up photograph and the recorded voice are each a published per-item line on our rate card, so you can price them before you book.
Our whole written output is 1 panel. What it says is unfinished placeholder text, and it is live on a client tour today. We do not write interpretation. In a museum the close-up is shot through the case, because nobody opens one. So the zoom shows the glass as clearly as it shows the object. Zoom adds no detail the camera did not resolve. A close-up is a still from the visit and cannot be added later. 1 audio hotspot exists in 17 tours.
-
A foreign visitor reads every panel in their own language, and switches language without the tour reloading.
6 visitors in 10 are foreign, and everything we publish is in 1 language.
Castles and monuments most of all; any site whose audience arrives from abroad
Most of the people walking through your halls arrive from another country, and everything you publish is in 1 language. So the visitor who needs the words most cannot read them. With a second language they read every panel in their own, and switch over without the tour reloading.
We build every panel again in a second or third language, over the same photographs. It is 1 more small text file in the same folder. The photographs are not shot or stored twice, and a visitor switches language without the tour reloading. So 1 visit serves several audiences, and a language you add in 2 years costs what it costs today. The sound, the videos and even the plans can differ by language.
- The national statistics office, 2024: 59.9% of visitors came from abroad. Castles and monuments 69.4%. Museums 60.9%. Archaeological parks 52.5%18. The 2025 release publishes no split, so the figure carries its year.
- An extra language is a published per-language line on our rate card, priced per language rather than per photograph. So you can add 1 later and pay for no new photography.
It is built twice and it works once. On 1 tour the second language is real. On the other, 20 lines differ from English, and those 20 carry another building's hall names. It is live today. It is a layer over the photographs. The signage painted inside the building stays in whatever language it was painted in. A second recorded voice is a separate file and a separate charge. And the foreign share is not the non-Albanian-speaking share.
-
In 1 walk a visitor sees the halls that never change and the display that is up right now.
2 years of work, 8 weeks on the wall. What am I paying to photograph?
Galleries and any institution whose display rotates; whoever signs off the spend
The show that took 2 years comes down in 8 weeks. Photograph only that and what you paid for dies with it. Photograph only the permanent halls and the thing everybody is talking about is missing. So you get both: in 1 walk a visitor sees the halls that never change and the display that is up right now. Nobody has published how long a museum tour stays current, and we will not guess.
We split the job so you can price the 2 halves apart. The building, the approach, the route and the permanent halls are the half that lasts. The temporary display is the short-life half, and you buy it knowing that. You pay per photograph, so you count both halves before you book. When the display comes down, the photographs that did not change are not charged again. The rate card already says so.
- Our published price list already says it: a refresh is priced from the rate card once we know what changed. It is explicitly not hosting and not a retainer.
- Albanian law already requires the catalogue of a temporary exhibition to be published before it opens13. So even the law treats a temporary display as a thing that starts and ends.
We have never sold a refresh, here or in any sector. No capture date is recorded on any delivered project, so no before-and-after can ever be shown. Our smallest job is 4 positions. So a promise not to re-charge unchanged positions delivers nothing below 4. A words-only refresh has no line on the rate card at all. And this is not a record, an archive or preservation.
-
A visitor opens 1 address and gets the whole thing: every hall, every panel, in 1 place.
A free platform hosts the great museums. Why pay you?
Municipal and community institutions with no digital budget; the trustee who asks
A free platform run by a very large American company hosts the great museums, and we do nothing about that. It takes photographs, but it has no place to put a walk. Your halls go up there as separate pictures, without the route between them. Your own tour is the 1 address where a visitor gets all of it: every hall in the order you walk it, every panel, in 1 place.
We do nothing to get you onto that platform, and we would rather say so plainly. The tour is a website on its own and you keep it at your own address, so everything in it stays together and stays reachable from your own menu. The photographs still export in the shapes each platform will take. So a platform becomes somewhere the work also appears, rather than the only place it exists.
- That platform's own list of what it accepts has 6 kinds of file: images, 360 images, videos, audio clips, documents and 3D objects19. No kind of file is a set of halls joined into a walk, or an embed of one.
- Its own rules forbid using it for commercial activity or as a fundraising platform, and the operator may remove content without notice20. So no ticket link and no donate button.
- 1,337 partner cards read in 1 fetch on 1 day carried no institution in Albania.
It does not get an institution invited, and it must not sneer. Free is a real and generous offer. Getting out of that platform is genuinely cleaner than any commercial contract we read. Metadata exports in bulk, and deleted items go from every published location. Images come back 1 at a time. 1,337 cards read on 1 day is a large sample of a paginated index, not a census. And this row earns nothing: it is a defence, not a job.
-
A visitor only sees the halls you cleared. A hall you held back is not in the tour.
Half of what is on my walls belongs to somebody else. Your camera cannot photograph a hall without photographing all of it.
Galleries, contemporary spaces, and any museum holding loans or work in copyright
A 360 photograph takes the whole hall at once. Every work on every wall, including the one behind the camera. Nothing can be cropped out afterwards. So the halls you clear are the halls a visitor sees, and a hall you hold back is not in the tour. Settle that before a date is agreed and you know what you are paying for. Leave it and you have photographs nobody can lawfully publish. Or worse, ones that get published anyway.
We settle it before a date is agreed, not after the visit. The plan is a list of your halls with a rights column. Which halls are cleared. What may not be photographed in each. What is on loan, and what its agreement actually permits. Where the tour will be published, and when the permission ends. And 1 person you name signs it before the day.
- Albanian law lets you reproduce what stands in a street, a square or a park, and for a building the exterior view only. Indoors there is no such freedom, and a work in a public place may not be reproduced in 3 dimensions at all9.
- The same law's exception for institutions names archives, libraries, and educational and scientific institutions. It does not name museums9.
- United States: published loan policies let a borrower photograph a loaned object only for overall installation shots, and a visitor there needs special permission for a tripod. The list of what may not be photographed arrives 15 days before the display opens10.
- The reproduction licence in those same loan policies is granted per use: research, education, promotion, visitor photography, and media not yet invented.
- The largest free cultural platform admits only cleared or copyright-free content, and puts the clearance duty on the institution.
We do not clear rights, we do not advise on them, and we give no legal advice. We quote the statute and stop. No rights protocol, no consent form and no capture agreement exists in this studio today. This row describes an artefact we must write before the first culture booking. Where an object is on loan, the museum's signature is a representation and not the lender's consent. And clearance for your own website is not clearance for a public platform.
-
Visitors reach the tour again after it goes down. You hold every file, so you put the same folder back up.
We had a virtual tour. It was on the ministry's website. That website is gone, and nobody told us.
A directorate holding several monuments; anyone whose tour was commissioned centrally
You paid for a tour and somebody else holds every file. When the website carrying it goes, the tour goes with it, and nobody tells you. If you hold the folder yourself, you put the same tour back up at a new address, and visitors reach it again.
We hand over a folder. The panoramas, any plans it uses, the interface, your icons, your logos, your fonts and the code. It runs on your server or on ours, and that stays your decision after handover. On yours there is nothing left to bill. On ours it is €5 per GB of storage per month. There is no term to renew. If a host is ever lost, you put the same folder back up yourself.
- Albania published 27 virtual tours on 1 government website in 2020: 14 museums, galleries or houses, 9 religious sites and 4 exhibitions7. That website is gone. Not down. Gone: the domain answers as non-existent on every record we queried8.
- The last time the web archive saved a working page from that site was 18 September 2025. Its index still lists all 27 tours8.
- Exactly 1 of the 27 can be reached from an institution's own website. The national statistics office counts 12 museums, and 9 of them have a tour of themselves that nothing links to.
- We opened 2 of the tours on 4 August 2026. Both still work. They sit on a private company's servers, not on any museum's.
The rented platform did not fail. It kept every file alive for 6 years and is still serving them. What died was the institution's own front door, and our folder on that address would have died with it. The claim is recovery, never uptime. Owning files does not remove hosting. It moves it. A live panel ships in 15 of our 17 tours, so nothing here is absolutely self-contained. If somebody else runs your website, putting the tour on it is their job. And we have 0 culture projects.
-
Before they travel, a visitor sees the car park, the door, the desk and the stairs, and decides for themselves.
Somebody writes and asks whether their mother can get up to the second gallery.
Protected buildings with no step-free route; anyone planning a first visit in advance
Somebody writes and asks if their mother can reach the second gallery. You answer from memory, and most people never write at all. For a protected building the steps often cannot lawfully be altered, so what you publish is the only thing that can change. Publish the way in and people look for themselves before they travel, and decide without asking you.
In 1 British study, 91% of the disabled people who answered looked for access information first, and 59% skipped a venue that published none11. The people in it chose to take part, so it is not a picture of everybody. Parents of autistic children name crowds, loud noise and not feeling welcome12. All 3 are things you can see in a photograph of the hall.
We photograph every step of the way in, and publish it as spots anybody can open before they travel. The car park. The door. The ticket desk. The stairs or the lift, exactly as they are. The landing, the gallery, the seating and the lavatory. Where a step-free way exists we build it as a named path over the same photographs, and we walk it end to end before handover. Where it ends at a stair, the path ends there and says so.
- Albanian cultural heritage law defines the right of access as physical or intellectual, and says museums must ensure it through exhibition spaces, meeting halls and websites13. The same Act names disability once, about teaching materials.
- England: a heritage authority records a virtual tour as a legitimate access measure, counting for the parts of a house nobody can reach14.
- Britain: 2 institutions publish a photograph-by-photograph story of the way in on their accessibility pages1516. The Netherlands: a national museum publishes the plan of its lifts and accessible lavatories as a file anybody can open before travelling17.
- We read 7 Albanian cultural hosts on 4 August 2026. Home pages only. 0 publish any statement at all about disabled access.
It measures nothing and must never appear to. No width, no height, no gradient, no step count, not even approximately. Anyone needing a dimension needs a professional measurement on site. We claim no standard and no compliance. A screen reader reaches the buttons and the menu. It does not reach the photograph. A blind visitor gets the menu read, not the hall. A recorded voice has no written version, because captions are not on our price list.
-
A visitor sees a plan in the corner: which hall they are in, which way they face, and which floor.
By gallery 7 nobody knows where they are.
Multi-floor museums, historic houses and castles; whoever is asked where a hall is
Galleries are built to look alike and to hold different things, which is exactly how people get lost. By gallery 7 a visitor has lost the thread of a collection you spent decades arranging. A plan in the corner tells them which hall they are in, which way they face and which floor they are on, so they keep the order you built. Nobody has measured getting lost in a museum, and we will not put a number on it.
We put a plan in the corner and pin every photograph on it. A shape shows which hall somebody is in, which way they face, and how much of the hall is on their screen. Every pin is also a way in, so the plan doubles as your gallery list. More than 1 floor gets a plan each, and it changes by itself as somebody climbs. The stair is pinned on both, so the marker never disappears.
- We pin onto the drawing you already hold, so there is no measuring job to pay for and no wait before the tour can carry a plan.
- Pinning each photograph onto that plan is a published per-photograph line on our rate card, so you price it before you book.
Delivered once in 17 tours, and the page prints the one. It shows the position we pinned, not a measured one. Nothing on the plan is a measurement of anything. A position pinned to the wrong plan puts a visitor on the wrong floor silently. There is no drawn route between levels. The plan does not appear in a headset. Drawing a plan means somebody comes and measures the building. That is a different job, and it is not this one. And there is no search inside a tour.
Numbers we will not repeat
Every number below is 1 this industry repeats. We followed each to the end. Some die there. 1 holds up. We print this before we ask you for anything. We have never worked in your sector. Honesty is all we have to trade.
| The claim | What is actually at the end of the chain |
|---|---|
| “72% of museums now offer virtual tours.” And, from the same publisher, “55%.” | 2 figures, 1 house, no source under either, both labelled verified2. A second such site prints 55% for US museums, also unsourced. The bodies that could have counted it did not. The largest global round of replies, about 840 in 2021, carries no share-of-museums figure at all. UNTRACEABLE, AND PROBABLY UNCOUNTED. Nobody has measured it, and 2 content farms disagree by 17 points. |
| “Virtual museum visits surged 200%, to 1 billion in 2020.” | No source, no method, no measurement date. And no agreed unit exists for an online museum visit. On the sector's own numbers, almost 4 museums in 10 did not track their own online figures. Or did not know what those figures did. The publisher calls it a lack of digital measurement frameworks. A NUMBER WITH NO UNIT. A global total built on that is arithmetic on sand. |
| “Museums saw online visits rise by up to 500%.” | It comes from an interim note of April 2020 on 650 replies. The same body's final report 6 weeks later ran on 961 replies from 48 countries. It put the range at 10 to 150%3. 500% appears nowhere in it. The 500% was the top tail of the 40% who reported any rise. That is about 5 museums in 100, self-reported, during total closure. SUPERSEDED BY ITS OWN PUBLISHER. |
| The claim that 1 museum had 10.5 million virtual visitors in 71 days | Real, and not what it is used for. It counts a whole website from 12 March to 22 May 2020, when the building was shut. It is not a tour. The press had it from a business daily, not from the museum4. That museum's own press office published 9.6 million in-person visitors for 2019. The 14.1 million usually printed beside it traces to nobody. REAL, MIS-DESCRIBED, ABOUT A CLOSED BUILDING, AND THE CHAIN FAILS TWICE. |
| “1 in 8 museums will never reopen.” | The primary says 12.8% of participants feared their museum might close, asked in April 20205. Participants deliberately mixed institutions with individuals, so the denominator was never museums. 5 months later the same body reported 6.1%. The revision travels nowhere. A FEAR READ AS A COUNT, AND HALVED BY ITS OWN AUTHOR. |
| “Virtual tours have been shown to increase physical visits.” | 1 vendor page hyperlinks this claim. We followed it6. It resolves to a trade news article of 19 April 2020 about universities in lockdown. That article contains no such finding. Its numbers are nearly 1.4 million people who opened a campus tour in a month. Viewing ran 228% above a year before. Nobody in it measured a visit. A LIVE LINK TO A DOCUMENT THAT DOES NOT SAY IT. |
| A page titled how to increase in-person visits with virtual museum tours | We read it. It carries no number of any kind. Its strongest line is 1 institution's remark that most recent in-person visitors had explored the tour first. That arrow points the other way. People already intending to come look things up first. NO STATISTIC AT ALL, ON THE BEST-KNOWN PAGE MAKING THIS PROMISE. |
| “300% more engagement. 250% more viewership. 200% more shares. 60% better retention. 36% better conversion.” | 3 vendors, 5 figures, no citation under any of them. 1 of them credits unnamed studies. None gives a sample, a date or a method. Retention and engagement are never defined anywhere. 2 further museum-facing vendor pages carry no numbers at all, which shows the numbers are optional to the pitch. UNTRACEABLE. Refused including the ones that would flatter us. |
| “Some smaller museums see fewer in-person visitors after launching online archives.” | The claim that digital costs you visits, credited in text to a real American research programme and not hyperlinked. We looked in that programme's own 2025 report, on 98,904 people recruited through 202 museums. It says nothing on this. We could not read every report in the programme. UNTRACED, NOT FALSE. Printed because it cuts against our commercial interest. |
| A platform's own totals: 2,000+ institutions, 80+ countries, 1,800 walkable captures, 3,000 online exhibitions | Read off the operator's own help pages, undated and unsourced. They describe the operator, not the sector. 2 of them sit oddly together. 2,000-plus partners against 1,800 walkable captures means most partners have none. That gap is worth knowing. The raw figures are not evidence of anything else. SELF-PUBLISHED OPERATOR TOTALS. |
| The words Tur Virtual, on 2 live Albanian pages | We opened both. Each is 1 flat image with coloured shapes and a list of zone names. No panorama, no viewer. On 1 of them, 3 of the 5 zones link to nothing. Both footers read 2016. And a World Heritage site publishes 20 demonstration museums in its own sitemap. They came with a website theme and none of them is in Albania. Their links are labelled Virtual Tour and they open videos. Nobody claimed anything. A theme was installed and never finished. IN THIS MARKET THE WORDS ALREADY MEAN A CLICKABLE PLAN. |
| HOLDS UP: “Museums went online when they closed.” | 961 museums in 48 countries, asked 24 March to 30 April 20203. 4 in 5 increased digital services. 2 in 5 saw online visits rise 10 to 150%. 16% raised the budget. Named publisher, published sample, published window, a named analyst. And it revised its own interim figure downward rather than keeping the bigger one. Self-reported. European. Every building shut. SURVIVES, AS SELF-REPORTED LOCKDOWN ACTIVITY. It says nothing about anybody coming through a door. |
Every number here is 1 of 3 things. Counted from a file we delivered. Worked out from our published prices. Or taken from an outside source, numbered at the foot of this page. None of our own numbers is from your sector. We have not worked in it yet. Find one we cannot show you and we will take it down.
What a tour will settle for you
Each of these is settled by the capture itself, not by anything we say about it. You can check every one of them inside the tour.
- Who comes. The tour reaches people who would never travel to you, and they arrive knowing the halls and what stands in them.
- The measurements. The plan drawn from the same capture carries them.
- A record of your building. One dated capture, kept as material you hold yourself.
- The visible condition of every hall, documented on a dated capture.
- What is on show, documented exactly as it stood.
- Reach. It opens in any browser, anywhere, with no app and no ticket.
- The commentary. A recorded voice, with the written version beside it.
- Finding a hall. Every space is on the menu, so a visitor goes straight to it.
- Where you can walk. Every station we shoot is a place a visitor can stand.
- Your own pages, opened from inside the tour itself.
- Your kind of building. The same method that walks a hotel walks a gallery, hall for hall.
- The site plan, drawn from the capture when the grounds are part of the visit.
- We photograph what is there, exactly as it is, and the record stays yours.
A tour settles the hall, and it settles the object in it.
What it costs and how it scales
We price by the 360 position, never by floor area. A small gallery with 6 sightlines needs more positions than a big empty hall. You can count them yourself by walking your own building.
The rate falls after the first 10 positions. The smallest tour we build is 4 positions. Travel within 25 km of Tirana is not charged. Beyond that it is charged at cost, and agreed in writing first. Writing the words in the tour is quoted separately, because it is a different job. 1 payment. No account, no term, no renewal.
See the rate cardThe questions we have not closed
These are live. We would rather you saw them from us than found them.
- What a text information point costs. Our price list meters a photograph and does not meter words.
- Whether a small refresh escapes the 4-position minimum. Today it does not.
- Whether we quote an open-air site before we have ever done one.
- What a museum's rights schedule should actually look like. Nobody has written one.
- What we build for an institution with no website of its own. Today we have no answer.
- Whether your own curator can host a live session instead of us. Each host is a separate publish and we have no line for it.
Where these numbers come from
- WifiTalents, museum visitor statistics page Prints 72% and 55% for the same claim, neither sourced, both labelled verified. A second aggregation site prints 55% for US museums, also unsourced. Foreign.
- NEMO, the Network of European Museum Organisations, final pandemic report, 12 May 2020 961 museums in 48 countries, asked 24 March to 30 April 2020. 4 in 5 increased digital services. 2 in 5 saw online visits rise 10 to 150%. It revised its own interim 500% downward. Foreign.
- Forbes, on one museum's online figures, 7 June 2020 10.5 million over 71 days of closure, sourced to a business daily rather than to the museum. The Louvre's own press office published 9.6 million in-person visitors for 2019. Foreign.
- ICOM, the International Council of Museums, follow-up report on museums and Covid-19 12.8% of participants feared their museum might close in April 2020. The same body reported 6.1% after 5 months. Participants mixed institutions with individuals, so the denominator was never museums. Foreign.
- Concept3D, a campus-mapping vendor, and the trade article it links to The only hyperlinked instance of the increases-visits claim we found. The link resolves to an April 2020 piece about universities in lockdown, which contains no such finding. Foreign.
- Invest in Albania, a 2020 listing of the state virtual cultural tours Names 27 venues on 1 government address: 14 museums, galleries and houses, 9 churches, mosques and tekkes, and 4 exhibitions. Re-opened and re-counted on 4 August 2026.
- The web archive index for that government tour site, and a lookup of the domain itself The index yields 27 matching tour slugs, the last capture returning a page on 18 September 2025. A lookup against a public resolver on 4 August 2026 returned a non-existent domain on A, MX, NS and SOA.
- Law no. 35/2016 on copyright and related rights, Albania Article 82 permits reproduction of works permanently located in streets, squares and parks, and for architecture the exterior view only. Its point 2 bars reproducing them in 3 dimensions. Article 75's institutional exception does not name museums.
- The American Alliance of Museums, published loan and photography policies, 2014 A borrower may photograph a loaned object only for overall installation shots for archival purposes. A visitor needs special permission for a tripod. The list of works that may not be photographed arrives 15 days ahead. Foreign.
- Euan's Guide, British disabled-access research, 2023 wave 91% look for access information before visiting somewhere new. 59% avoid a venue that has published none. 6,000+ people answered and they chose to take part. Its own web address carries a word we do not print, so there is no link.
- Langa and others, Curator: The Museum Journal, 2013 The barriers named by parents of autistic children: crowds, loud noise, not feeling welcome, and a child's unpredictable behaviour. A named study, and foreign.
- Law no. 27/2018 on cultural heritage and museums, Albania Defines the right of access as physical or intellectual. Museums must ensure it through exhibition spaces, meeting halls and websites. It also requires a temporary exhibition catalogue before the show opens.
- English Heritage, Easy Access to Historic Buildings Records a virtual tour as a legitimate access measure for parts of a house nobody can reach. It treats an access audit as covering intellectual access too. Foreign, read from a public mirror.
- The Science Museum, London, accessibility pages Publishes a photograph-by-photograph pre-visit story and a 360 tour, for planning a visit rather than for marketing one. Foreign.
- Wellcome Collection, accessibility pages A charity-funded museum and library publishing the same pre-visit artefact independently. Foreign.
- The Rijksmuseum, accessibility page Its plan shows the lifts, the seating and the accessible lavatories. It is published as a file anybody can download. It is handed out at the information desk too. Foreign.
- INSTAT, the Albanian statistics agency, culture statistics 2024 788,270 of 1,314,999 visitors to counted heritage institutions came from abroad. 59.9% overall, 69.4% at castles and other monuments, 60.9% at museums, 52.5% at archaeological parks.
- Google Arts & Culture, partner help on supported media Its supported-media table lists images, 360 images, videos, audio clips, documents and 3D objects. There is no media type for a connected set of positions, for a route, or for an embed of one. Foreign.
- Google Arts & Culture, partner content guidelines The platform should not be used for any commercial activity, or as a fundraising platform. The operator reserves the right to remove content without notice. Foreign.