Pay once for the tour, own every file in it, and the link on your own website keeps opening
We build 1 capture and hand you the folder: the panoramas, the interface, icons, your logos, fonts and the code. It runs on your own server with nothing further to pay, or on ours for a storage fee. It is for shops, shopping centres and brand stores that would rather buy the walkthrough than rent it. Every claim on this page is printed with its limit beside it.
3 things we will not tell you
- We will not tell you a tour brings more people through the door. We looked for a study that measured it. We could not find one. Not for a shop, in any country. The numbers this trade quotes are in the table below.
- We will not tell you it sells more. There is no cart in what we build. No checkout. No payment. The tour shows the room and hands the visitor to where you already sell.
- We will not pretend you have to pay us to be on the map. The map's own owner1 tells you to publish there yourself. That route is free and it says so2. There is no badge to hold. What we sell is the built walkthrough you own.
-
The reason people make the trip is visible before they make it.
People stop at the window, look, and walk on. Whatever is putting them off is inside. And I cannot show them inside from out there.
Speciality and destination shops whose inside is the reason for the trip
Someone stops at your window. They cannot see the room, the stock or the people inside, so they judge the shop on its front and walk on. A tour lets them look inside first, from the street or from home. They come in already knowing what is there. We found no study that measures this for a shop, in any country, so we put no number on it.
We photograph the approach, the way in and the selling floor as linked spots. Your customer walks them on a phone before they leave home. Each spot shows the room in every direction at once, so nothing is left out and the awkward corner is in the picture with everything else.
- United States: 240 adults explored tours built from 360 photographs of real shops18. Seeing the shop and moving through it made them more likely to say they would visit. Feeling something about the brand did the same.
- United States: the best-known model of shop choice was tested on a screen19. 2 studies showed 297 and 169 students a 5-minute walkthrough of a real shop. Layout, colour and fit-out counted for more than staff or music. The model explained 54% of the choice.
- The mapping platform asks for this material itself1: “Capture shots of your facilities, product shelves, and menus.”
Every study here is foreign. Every one stops at a screen. Not 1 counted a visit. Not 1 counted a receipt. A meta-analysis of 47 tests20 weighed intention against behaviour. A big change in the first gives a small one in the second. And 1 paper21 finds lifelike websites can put people off. Does your shop photograph better than it lives? Then this is the wrong purchase. It is 1 day and 1 light.
-
The route to a hard-to-find door stops being something you explain on the phone.
We are up a flight of stairs, at the back. The door does not look like a shop door. People give up before they find us.
Upper floors, courtyards, back streets, and units behind a shared entrance
A customer who cannot find your door does not arrive. A hard address costs you customers every month, not just once. With a tour they watch the walk from the street to your door before they set off. They arrive knowing the stairs, the landing and the door. We found no figure for how often people give up, so none goes on this page.
We photograph the route the way it is walked: the street, the entrance, the stairs or the lift, the landing, the door and the room. Your customer can walk it as many times as they like. In each spot they arrive facing the right way, so they always know where to go next. That direction is set room by room when the tour is built.
- The arrows that link the spots come with every tour and are never an extra. Our rate card says it in its own words: “the arrows that let people walk the tour are the tour, not an extra”. So the answer here carries no surcharge.
- Which way a visitor faces when they come through each doorway is set by hand when the tour is built.
It records no distance. No walking time. No gradient. No number of steps. “2 minutes from the square” is answered by walking it. 11 of our 12 project pages record no floor plan. So the in-tour plan a unit inside a centre asks for next has never been built here. And a capture is dated. New hoarding on the route is not in last year's tour.
-
A shopper clicks a product on the shelf and sees what it is, with a close-up photograph and a video.
The tour shows my room. It does not show what is on the shelf, which is the only thing I actually sell.
Speciality, food and destination retail, where the stock is the reason to come
Your customer comes for what is on the shelf, not for the room. A plain walkthrough shows the room. And a service does not show up in a photograph at all: alterations, repairs, fitting, ordering in, engraving. Here a shopper clicks the shelf and sees the product, or clicks the repair bench and sees the work you do.
We put a marker on the thing itself. A shopper clicks it and a full-size photograph opens over the room, or a video of that product plays in the same spot. The brand they search by name, the repair bench, the made-to-measure desk, the service counter. Each close-up is priced on its own and shot on the same visit, so the picture and the position come from 1 trip.
- An information point opens where the visitor is standing. They see the product without leaving the room or losing their place.
- Photographs load in pieces at several sizes, so a shopper can zoom in on a label or a nameplate and it stays sharp. That is what makes a close-up worth attaching.
The 1 written panel in our whole archive is placeholder text. It is live today. We have never shipped finished written interpretation. The words come from you, or they are quoted as separate work. A point cannot be added later without another visit. It carries no price and no promotion. No stock level and no availability. A shelf is dated the day it is photographed.
-
A customer from another country reads your whole tour in their own language.
I trade 4 months a year. Half the people walking past my window are Italian, and a lot of the rest are not Albanian either. Why would I pay every month for something I only need in July?
Coastal, seasonal and tourist shops, and anyone whose trading year is short
Plenty of the people who walk past your window do not read Albanian. If the tour is written in 1 language, everyone else is guessing at it — the room names, the labels, whatever you wrote about the stock. Give it a second language and an Italian reads every word in Italian. A German reads it in German. Same shop, same photographs, their own words.
We rebuild every word of the tour in another language over the same photographs — the room names, the labels, the panels, the buttons. Nothing is photographed a second time. You pick which languages, and each one is priced on its own. 1 visit, more than 1 audience.
- Border entries of foreign citizens were 2,381,864 in August 2025 and 552,187 in January 202629. That is 4.3 times as many. They are border movements, not shoppers.
- Foreign visitors who stayed in Albanian accommodation in May 202630: Italy 19%, Kosovo 11%, Germany 10%, France 9%, Poland 6%, other 45%. It counts people who slept here, not people who walked into a shop. We found no shop-level figure.
- A second language is a listed line on that rate card, priced per language rather than per photograph.
All 12 of our projects carry exactly 1 language. So this is capability rather than track record. A layer sits over the same photographs. The signage, the tickets and the packaging stay in whatever language they were printed in. 45% of visitors30 are from somewhere else, so 2 languages still miss most of them. And a seasonal shop is usually outside the free travel radius. A day's travel sits against the smallest capture we sell.
-
Change the stock without the tour turning into a picture of a shop you no longer have.
I changed the whole shop in March. Whatever you shot in February is a picture of a shop I do not have any more.
Fashion, seasonal and food retail, and anyone who refits or re-ranges
A shop goes out of date faster than any other building. A hotel room looks the same in 3 years. A selling floor is different in 3 weeks. So we build the tour on the parts that stay. You change the stock in March and it still looks like your shop. You are not paying for a fresh shoot every season.
We frame every interior spot so the picture rests on the things that do not move: the fixtures, the counter, the floor, the ceiling, the lighting. The stock is in every frame and the subject of none. We keep prices, promotions and dated displays out of frame. We tell you the date the photographs were taken, and we say all of this before you buy.
- A visitor can zoom in close enough to read a label. A readable price ticket is a published price on a shop anyone can identify, so we keep tickets out of frame.
- A refresh is charged only for what changed. Our published rule, in its own words: “It is not hosting and it is not a retainer.”
- The mapping platform says its own pictures “could be anywhere from a few months to a few years old”31. And it tells a shop to update its photographs1 after a remodel or new products.
We have never delivered a refresh. Not in this sector, not in any other. The smallest tour we build is 4 photographs. The minimum is what 4 costs. So a change smaller than that costs what a whole small tour costs, plus travel. On a shop, most real changes are smaller than that. Whether the minimum applies to a refresh is unruled. So we will not sell a fresh capture as the cure for a stale tour. And a monthly platform absorbs small changes better than we do.
-
Pay once for the capture and own the files, instead of renting a viewer month after month.
We paid for a tour once. It lives on somebody else's account. The link on our own menu goes nowhere now. And I do not know what is left if we stop paying.
Shops about to sign a monthly one, and shops already renting
A tour is a one-off job that is often sold as a monthly bill. The supplier decides what happens when you stop paying. The link on your own website stays up after the tour behind it has gone, and it opens nothing.
We opened 200 Albanian shop websites in 5 towns, and 158 of them loaded13. 3 businesses had published a tour you could walk. All 3 rented the viewer. 2 of the 3 are dead today, and the words are still on the shop's own menu. We did not contact them, so we do not know what happened.
We do 1 capture and hand you a folder: the panoramas, the interface, the icons, your logos, fonts and the code. Put it on your own server and there is nothing more to pay. Or we host it on our subdomain for €5 per GB of storage a month. The tour has no subscription behind it, and you hold the files either way.
- A capture platform's own subscription agreement, clause 11.214. When it ends the customer “will cease to have any ability to export … Customer Image Data”.
- The same agreement renews itself14. Stopping it takes 30 days' written notice. It sets out no grace period for export, and its separate terms say you “must destroy any material obtained from the Service”.
- A second vendor publishes what a downgrade does15. Hotspots “will be visible only to you”. And: “Your custom domain will be disabled and all the links will no longer work”. The photographs survive. The walking between rooms stops.
- 1 of the 2 dead tours is a menu item on a national grocery chain's own site16. It returns 404, and the menu item is still on the site.
A supplier abroad publishes “Yours for good” and “No subscription”17. On the same page it charges a yearly hosting fee for its other product. One-time and yours-to-keep is a claim this market already makes. Owning files does not abolish hosting. It relocates it. A folder pushes to no platform by itself. Show a live map inside a tour and that panel works for as long as that service does. Same for a page from your own site.
-
You agree what the camera records before the camera comes out, and it is written into the job.
That camera sees everything. My customers, my staff, my till, my stock. And the shop across the road can open it too.
The owner approving the visit, and the staff and customers in frame
A shop is a public place, and it trades while it is photographed. Your staff, your customers, your till and your stock are all in the room. So you decide what the camera records before anyone starts, and what you say no to stays out.
We agree what gets photographed before anything is photographed. We walk round with you first, write down the spots, and write a list of what is not taken: the office, the safe, the alarm panel, the back door, the key cabinet. We work around your busiest hours, with staff who know the camera is there. The job says in writing how long we keep the files and how to have them taken down.
- A 360 photograph has no crop. Everything in the room is in the frame, in every direction. That is why the list of what is not taken is agreed first.
- The mapping platform puts the duty on the photographer32. Its own words: “it's the photographer's responsibility to decide which elements … must be blurred to respect others' privacy”.
- Working around your trading hours is wording we already publish. It was not written for this page.
- We did not open Albania's data-protection law, so we print no article number here.
This is a promise about how we work. It is not something the software does. We have no blurring line on our rate card. No removal line either. So “we will take it out afterwards” is not ours to offer. We have not settled 1 retention period that covers every job. And a shop photographed empty has no life in it. Where looking busy is the appeal, that is a real cost.
The numbers you have been shown, and where each one ends
This trade sells with numbers. We opened the source under each one. Some are real and about a different business. Some point at a page that no longer exists. Some point at nobody. Here is where each chain ends.
| The claim | What is actually at the end of the chain |
|---|---|
| “Listings with photos and a virtual tour are twice as likely to generate interest.” | A 5-page marketing document from 20154, published by the platform that sells the placement. Its own words: 1,201 people, collected over 13 days. Each person saw 2 listings, 1 with a tour and 1 without. The 2 listings were a hotel and a restaurant. Each person was asked to rate their interest in booking a reservation. Then the 2 were pooled into 1 result. The research firm is named only as independent. No shop was in it. A shop takes no reservation. |
| “When searching for businesses, consumers use mapping products 44% of the time.” | The same document cites 1 line for this4. The citation is a shortened link and it has been retired, so it now resolves to nothing. We downloaded 3 copies of the consultancy report behind it5. The string 44% appears in none of them. The only copy anybody can download is marked a confidential draft. So the platform is misquoting a document it chose to cite. |
| “On average, 41% of these place searches result in an on-site visit.” | Same document, same dead citation, same 3 copies5. 41% appears in none of them. Neither does on-site. A related file has a comparable figure. It is a tick box on a pick-any list, answered by 186 people. Downstream that becomes a measured visit rate, with on average attached to something that is not an average. This is the sentence most retail sellers quote at you. |
| “Businesses with photos get 42% more requests for directions and 35% more clicks.” | A photo claim relabelled as a 360 claim. The page it is credited to carries no performance figure at all6. That page describes 3 kinds of photograph and 360 is not one of them. The page that once carried the figure now redirects to a product page. And it has begun to mutate. A large round-up prints 35% more website clicks for profiles with 100 or more photos, crediting nobody. |
| “Businesses with a virtual tour are twice as likely to generate in-person visits.” | 4 figures on 1 seller's page, all credited to the platform's internal studies, not 1 of them linked. The platform's own business page publishes no outcome figure of any kind1. Its only numbers are about its own size. And the 2015 questionnaire above measured stated interest in booking. Nobody measured a visit. |
| “78% of users see listings with virtual tours as more reliable.” | A real number about something else7. The wording in the study is 78% more likely to be viewed as well-established. It compares a complete listing with a bare one: hours, phone, website, photos, reviews. Tours are not in that study at all. The seller's version carries no source. American, 2014, and a stated laboratory setting. |
| “Customers spend 5 to 10 times more on sites with virtual tours.” | A foreign national business magazine, 2 September 20228. The byline is the chief executive of a virtual tour company. All 4 of its figures link to his own company's blog, which credits nobody. And upstream this was a time claim rather than a money one. It read keeps people looking 5 to 10 times longer. That trail ends at a dead domain. |
| “Up to a 30% increase in online-to-offline conversions.” | The page's own words are “Retailers who integrate virtual tours report”8. No retailer is named. No link, no sample, no date. Retailers report is not a source. The same page also says a tour moves you up a search result. We refuse that claim in both directions. |
| “A virtual tour lifted a department store's footfall 20% year on year.” | The best-documented footfall figure in this trade, and it is a testimonial9. A 2014 case study. The 20% sits inside a quotation from the retailer's own head of e-commerce. No method. No measurement. No control. And its own opening says the tour was made to promote a new store. That makes a year-on-year comparison for that store unreadable. Foreign, and a department store. |
| “4 times more engaging than video. 52% longer on the page. 80% increase in enquirers.” | 3 figures on 1 local supplier's retail page10. No footnote. No sample. No method. No date. No link. We searched the served page for the words source, study, research and sipas. None of them is there. The third figure names its own doubt: it is estimated. By nobody. This is the page you are most likely to be shown here. |
| “Consumers check photos before visiting.” | The biggest recurring research on local search asks people what they look at11. Contact details, opening hours, reviews, whether the details are right. It carries no finding about photographs at all. So the biggest body of evidence about how people choose a local business does not measure the thing we sell. We would rather print that than mine it. |
| “Full visibility into every shelf, fixture, and square foot at scale.” | The market leader's only substantive retail claim, with no footnote anywhere12. It is not a statistic. It is a measurement claim, and we refuse those permanently. We take no measurement from a photograph and we publish no margin of error. Ask anybody selling you a floor area which instrument produced it. |
Every number here came from 1 of 3 places. A tour we counted. Our published rates. Or a footnote at the foot of this page. Where a source has no live address, its footnote says so. Find a number we cannot back. We will take it off.
What a tour will settle for you
Each of these is settled by the capture itself, not by anything we say about it. You can check every one of them inside the tour.
- Whether you are open. The tour sits beside your hours, on your own page.
- What is on the shelves, as it stood on the day we photographed it.
- What things cost. The tour sits beside your prices, on your own page.
- The parking and the street outside your door.
- The dimensions. The plan drawn from the same capture carries the step, the aisle and the door.
- Whether anybody walks in. They arrive having already seen the shop.
- It sells. The tour links straight to the page where the order is placed.
- It stays current. A fresh capture is a morning's work when the fit-out changes.
- Who sees it. The walk can sit behind a link you control rather than on the open web.
- It is a dated record of the shop, in the light it actually has.
- How the tour was used. We report it, aisle by aisle, when you ask.
- Reach. It opens in any browser, on any phone, with no app.
- The step and the doorway, shown as they are before anybody travels.
- The customers who do not know the street. They walk in from anywhere.
A tour settles the shop, and it settles the sale with it.
What it costs, in shape
Priced per 360° photograph, never by floor area. €40 for each of the first 10 photographs in a job. €30 for every photograph after the 10th. €160 minimum, plus VAT. And here is the part that does not flatter us. The rate per photograph is the highest we charge, and the total is the lowest we quote. At 10 photographs or fewer that rate does not move. So the discount a bigger building gets never reaches a shop.
Travel within 25 km of our base in Tirana is not charged. Beyond that it is billed at cost. No markup. It is itemised and agreed in writing before booking. This matters more here than in any sector we sell to. A shopkeeper on the coast reading €160 should not expect the job to come to €160. Accommodation is billed the same way. That applies to anything needing more than 1 day on site. Neither ever appears first on an invoice.
3 to 5 working days, from the capture day to the files landing. Never less than 3. Features move that date more than the count does. VAT and travel are added to every number on the rate card. And the extras matter more on a small job. On a shop they are half the invoice rather than a garnish. So we scope them rather than sell them.
See the whole rate cardWhat we have not settled
Published because a page that admits nothing cannot be trusted about anything. None of these has an answer today. We would rather you read them here than meet them in a quote.
- Whether several shops on 1 trip are 1 job or several, and what that does to the price. The rate card takes 1 count and returns 1 price. So 10 shops bought separately cost more than the same photographs in 1 building. We have not ruled on it, so this page carries no price per branch.
- Whether the 4-photograph minimum applies to a refresh. Almost every real change in a shop is smaller than that. Our rate card prices a refresh from what actually changed. We cannot yet say what a small one costs. And we will not sell a fresh capture as the cure for a stale tour.
- Whether publishing your shelf publishes it to the shop across the road. It does. We think the trade is usually worth it, and we cannot prove that for your shop.
- We hold no outcome measurement of our own. No client has supplied one either. If one ever arrives with a method behind it, we will publish it, and say who measured it and how.
- Our own list of what we can do says reporting into your own account has been delivered. Our own counted archive says 0 of 17 tours carry an analytics tag of any kind. 1 of the 2 is wrong. Until we know which, reporting appears nowhere on this page as proof.
- What the shift to generated search answers11 does to any of this. We could not find a measurement of what it does to a shop. We would rather say so than guess.
Where these numbers come from
- Google, Street View business imagery It tells a business to publish the photographs itself, or with the help of a professional. It asks for shots of facilities, product shelves and menus. It advises updating after a remodel or new products. It publishes no outcome figure of any kind.
- Google, Street View Publish API usage limits The developer page for the publishing route. Its own words: all use is free of charge.
- Google, the power of media-rich map listings A 5-page marketing PDF from 2015. A total sample of 1,201 people, collected over 13 days. Each saw 1 hotel listing and 1 restaurant listing, with a tour and without. Each was asked to rate interest in booking a reservation.
- Oxera, the report the 44% and 41% are cited to Cited through a link shortener that has since been retired, so the citation resolves to nothing. We downloaded 3 copies and found neither figure in any of them. No stable public address exists, so there is nothing to link.
- Google, business profile photo guidelines It describes 3 kinds of photograph and carries no performance figure. The words 360, panorama, virtual tour and see inside appear nowhere on it.
- Google and Ipsos MediaCT, impact of search listings, 2014 1,000 American respondents. The 78% is about a complete listing against a bare one. Photos were the second-least-sought item at 15%, on a base of 474. 79%, 73% and 41% on habit, distance and trying somewhere new, base 1,000.
- A national business magazine, 2 September 2022 Foreign. The byline is the chief executive of a virtual tour company. All 4 of its figures link to his own company's blog, which credits nobody. We opened it and recorded no stable address, so there is nothing to link.
- A 2014 case study about a department store's virtual tour The 20% sits inside a quotation from the retailer's own head of e-commerce. No method, no measurement, no control. Its own opening says the tour was made to promote a new store. We opened it and recorded no stable address, so there is nothing to link.
- VirtualPro, retail page A local supplier. 3 figures, no footnote, no sample, no method, no date and no link anywhere on the page. Searching the served page for source, study, research and sipas returns none of them.
- BrightLocal, consumer search behaviour research 1,000 American adults on an online panel. It reports what people look at when choosing a local business, and how many use generated answers. It carries no finding about photographs at all.
- Matterport, retail page Its only substantive retail claim, and it is a measurement claim. No footnote appears anywhere on the page.
- Our own count, 5 Albanian towns Run on the open map's query interface and on the sites it records. 4,946 shops nationally, 366 with a web address. On the coast, 34 of 1,263. 200 sites opened, 158 reachable, 3 ever walkable. Our notes hold the query, so there is nothing to link.
- Matterport, platform subscription agreement and terms of service Clause 11.2 on what a customer can no longer export after termination. Automatic renewal, 30 days' written notice, and no export grace period anywhere in it. Its separate terms, not linked here, require material obtained from the service to be destroyed.
- Kuula, what happens when you downgrade Hotspots become visible only to the owner. The custom domain is disabled and the links stop working. The photographs themselves survive.
- Billa Albania A national grocery chain. A menu item on its own site points at a walkable tour and returns 404 when we checked. The menu item is still published.
- Biztour, price page A supplier in Britain. It publishes yours for good, no subscription, and no hosting or subscription fee at all. On the same page its enhanced and platform tours carry a stated yearly hosting fee. So the third line is scoped.
- International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 2020 240 American adults explored virtual tours built from 360 photographs of real shops. It measures stated intention to visit. American. Abstract only: recruitment, dates and effect sizes sit behind the paywall.
- Journal of Marketing, Baker, Parasuraman, Grewal and Voss, 2002 2 studies, 297 and 169 American undergraduates, each shown a 5-minute videotape walkthrough of a real shop. Design cues were stronger and more pervasive than employee and music cues. 54% of variance across both.
- Psychological Bulletin, 2006 meta-analysis of 47 experimental tests A medium-to-large change in intention produces only a small-to-medium change in behaviour. The publisher page returned 403 when we tried it, so there is nothing to link.
- Journal of Business Research, 2019 A 4-study paper. Lifelike websites can reduce interest in the real thing. The effect reverses only where the virtual and the real are not felt to be similar. Samples and country not obtained.
- Institute of Statistics of Albania, movements of citizens, August 2025 and January 2026 Border entries of foreign citizens, 2,381,864 against 552,187. The August release is the one linked, and the January release is a separate document. They are border movements and not shoppers.
- Institute of Statistics of Albania, accommodation establishments, May 2026 The origin mix of foreign visitors who slept in Albanian accommodation. Italy 19%, Kosovo 11%, Germany 10%, France 9%, Poland 6%, other 45%. It measures beds, not shop doorways.
- Google, Street View imagery policy Its own words on how old its imagery is: anywhere from a few months to a few years old. It carries no update advice, which is on the business imagery page instead.
- Google, contributed imagery and photo paths It puts the blurring obligation on the photographer, in those words. It also records that photo paths are no longer supported.